David Invest

A New Era for Urban Homes and Communities

• David (Viacheslav) Davidenko • Season 4

Share episode

Could New York City's "City of Yes for Housing Opportunity" be the blueprint for solving urban housing crises around the world? Join us as we explore how this ambitious initiative plans to transform the city's housing landscape with an eye-popping $5 billion investment aimed at creating 80,000 new homes over 15 years. By incentivizing affordable housing, repurposing vacant office spaces, and eliminating parking mandates, the project promises a radical shift in urban development. However, we also tackle the critical challenges, from ensuring long-term affordability to addressing community concerns over increased density and infrastructure stress.

Our conversation doesn't stop at the city’s plans. We also spotlight innovative housing models like co-living and accessory dwelling units (ADUs), which offer intriguing solutions to urban living challenges. Co-living promises affordability with added social perks, while ADUs allow for increased density without disrupting neighborhood character. Yet, these ideas are not without hurdles, such as shared space conflicts and infrastructure demands. We stress the importance of community engagement and sustainable development in achieving housing that is both equitable and future-proof. Let’s imagine together what a more livable, affordable, and sustainable urban future could look like, not just in New York but in cities across the globe.

🔗 Check out our website for more information and valuable resources: https://linkin.bio/davidinvest

📸 Follow us on Instagram for updates and behind-the-scenes content: https://www.instagram.com/davidinvestai/

🔗 Network with me on LinkedIn for professional connections and advice: https://www.linkedin.com/in/vdavidenko/

📧 Subscribe to our newsletter for exclusive investment tips and insights: https://sunrisecapitalgroup.com/subscribe/

📚 Check out my course on Udemy - https://www.udemy.com/course/passive-real-estate-investing/

Disclaimer: The content provided on this channel is intended for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or tax advice. We strongly recommend that you consult with qualified professionals before making any financial decisions. Past performance of investments is not indicative of future results. The information presented here is not a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or investments. Our firm may have conflicts of interest, and we do not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of the content provided. Investing involves risks, and you should carefully consid...

Speaker 1:

New York City, a place where, you know, soaring rents and and limited housing options have been the norm for well. It feels like forever Right, but something significant is happening, a potential turning point. The city is embarking on a bold experiment, really bold, with the potential to reshape its housing landscape for decades to come.

Speaker 2:

You're right. Yeah, it's called the City of yes for Housing Opportunity and it's generating a lot of buzz both locally and internationally. Cities around the world are grappling with similar housing challenges, so what New York does could become a model for better or worse.

Speaker 1:

This deep dive is all about getting to the heart of this initiative. We'll unpack its key elements, weigh the potential benefits and concerns and explore what it could mean for the future of not just New York but potentially, for cities worldwide.

Speaker 2:

Okay, so we're diving into the details of a plan that aims to create 80,000 new homes in the next 15 years. To put that in perspective, that's nearly double the number of units built in the past decade.

Speaker 1:

Wow, that's a serious commitment. It sounds like they're not just tinkering around the edges here.

Speaker 2:

But is that enough to make a real dent in the housing crisis? Well, the city's current housing deficit is estimated to be around half a million units. So, while 80,000 is a significant step, it's still just a portion of what's needed to truly address the problem.

Speaker 1:

Right. So this is a huge undertaking and to make it happen, the city is putting serious money on the table a $5 billion investment. What are they planning to do with all that cash?

Speaker 2:

That funding will be used for a variety of purposes, including incentivizing developers to build more affordable housing, investing in critical infrastructure to support new development, and providing resources for neighborhood planning and tenant protections.

Speaker 1:

One of the most talked about aspects of this plan is the elimination of parking mandates for new residential buildings in a large portion of the city. I have to admit, the idea of building in NYC without having to include parking is pretty mind-blowing.

Speaker 2:

It is a significant departure from traditional urban planning practices, but it reflects a growing understanding that the role of the private car in urban areas is changing, that the role of the private car in urban areas is changing. As more people rely on public transit, biking and walking, the need for dedicated parking spaces is diminishing, particularly in densely populated areas.

Speaker 1:

That makes sense. I mean, if fewer people are relying on cars, then freeing up that space for housing seems like a logical move. But wouldn't eliminating parking mandates inconvenience residents who do rely on cars?

Speaker 2:

There are definitely concerns about that. The city will need to carefully consider the potential impacts on residents who depend on cars, especially those with disabilities or those living in areas with limited access to public transportation.

Speaker 1:

You know it raises a crucial question about how the city plans to mitigate those potential downsides. And, speaking of shifting away from traditional uses of space, another part of the plan that caught my attention is the conversion of empty offices into apartments. I can almost picture those towering office blocks transforming into bustling residential spaces. What sparked this idea?

Speaker 2:

The rise of remote work post-pandemic, has left many office buildings underutilized. This presents a unique opportunity to repurpose existing structures to address the housing shortage. It's a concept called adaptive reuse, essentially giving old buildings new life. Instead of demolishing empty offices, they can be transformed into much needed housing units.

Speaker 1:

This office to apartment conversion sounds like a really clever way to tackle two problems at once the surplus of office space and the shortage of housing. But repurposing a building designed for offices into something suitable for living must come with some unique challenges.

Speaker 2:

You're absolutely right, it's not a simple process. These conversions will require significant renovations to meet residential building codes, ensure adequate natural light and ventilation and create livable spaces. Sure, adequate natural light and ventilation and create livable spaces. And then there are the logistical challenges of reconfiguring layouts, installing kitchens and bathrooms and upgrading infrastructure.

Speaker 1:

That's a lot to consider, but the potential payoff seems huge. Turning those empty towers into vibrant residential hubs could really change the feel of the city. I'm curious to see how they'll address these challenges and what kind of innovative solutions they'll come up with.

Speaker 2:

It's definitely something to watch closely. The success of these conversions will depend on a lot of factors, including the availability of financing, the complexity of the renovations and the willingness of developers to take on these projects.

Speaker 1:

This is already shaping up to be a really fascinating deep dive, and we've just scratched the surface. Deep dive, and we've just scratched the surface. In the next part, we'll delve into the affordability aspects of the plan, exploring how they plan to make sure these new homes are accessible to a wide range of New Yorkers. We'll also uncover the controversies and challenges that come with any major urban planning initiative. Welcome back to our deep dive into New York City's ambitious housing plan. We've already uncovered some pretty bold moves, like doing away with parking mandates in many areas and transforming empty offices into apartments. But let's get to the heart of the matter affordability. How is this initiative actually going to make housing more accessible to New Yorkers?

Speaker 2:

That's the million dollar question, isn't it? The plan hinges on a few key mechanisms. One is incentivizing developers to create what are called permanently affordable units. That sounds promising, but how do they actually ensure affordability in the long run?

Speaker 1:

It does sound almost too good to be true. Are we talking rent control, some kind of magic formula?

Speaker 2:

Not quite magic, but there are some specific policies at play. One is inclusionary zoning, which essentially means that developers who want to build larger or taller buildings in certain areas are required to set aside a certain percentage of those units as affordable.

Speaker 1:

So it's a tradeoff Developers get to build more, but in exchange they have to contribute to the city's affordable housing stock. That makes sense. But what's stopping them from just jacking up the rents on the market rate units to make up the difference?

Speaker 2:

That's where things get a bit more complex. The permanently affordable aspect comes from regulations that dictate how much rent can be increased on those designated units. These regulations might tie rent increases to inflation or median income levels, ensuring they remain affordable for the long term.

Speaker 1:

OK, so there are real policy teeth behind this affordability commitment. It's not just wishful thinking, but I imagine this whole density for affordability tradeoff sparks some debate. Not everyone is thrilled about taller buildings popping up in their neighborhood, right?

Speaker 2:

You're absolutely right. There's definitely a tension between the need for more housing and concerns about changing the character of neighborhoods. Some residents worry that higher density will lead to overcrowding, strain local services or alter the feel of their community.

Speaker 1:

So how does the plan address those concerns? Is it just a case of more housing at all costs?

Speaker 2:

No, it's not just about cramming in as many units as possible. The plan also emphasizes the importance of investing in the infrastructure and public spaces that make neighborhoods livable. We're talking about things like expanding public transportation options, creating more parks and green spaces, and improving pedestrian and bike infrastructure.

Speaker 1:

So it's a more holistic approach, recognizing that you can't just plop down a bunch of new buildings without considering the surrounding infrastructure and the needs of existing residents. It sounds like they're trying to strike a balance between increasing density and maintaining a good quality of life. But what about the financing? We keep hearing about this $5 billion investment. Where exactly is all that money going?

Speaker 2:

That's a great question, and it's important to understand how this funding will be used. A significant portion will go towards incentivizing developers to build affordable housing. This could be in the form of tax breaks, grants or low-interest loans.

Speaker 1:

So they're essentially making it more financially attractive for developers to prioritize affordable housing projects. What about the rest of the money?

Speaker 2:

Well, about $2 billion is earmarked for crucial infrastructure improvements like upgrading sewer and flood infrastructure, making street improvements and creating more open spaces. This directly addresses concerns about the strain that new development could put on existing infrastructure.

Speaker 1:

That's a huge chunk of change dedicated to infrastructure. It sounds like they're really trying to get ahead of potential problems and ensure that these new developments don't overwhelm existing systems. But beyond the big picture stuff like infrastructure and affordability, are there any innovative approaches that stand out to you as particularly impactful?

Speaker 2:

Absolutely. The plan embraces some unconventional housing types that could really shake things up. We touched on the conversion of empty offices into apartments, but there's more. The initiative also promotes co-living arrangements and legalized accessory dwelling units, or ADUs.

Speaker 1:

Now, you mentioned co-living earlier. I have to admit I'm really intrigued by this concept. It seems like a pretty big departure from traditional apartment living. Paint me a picture of what co-living actually looks like.

Speaker 2:

Imagine a modern apartment building designed specifically for apartment living. Paint me a picture of what co-living actually looks like. Imagine a modern apartment building designed specifically for shared living. You'd have your own private bedroom and bathroom, but you'd share a kitchen and living space with other residents. It's a model that prioritizes community and affordability, particularly appealing to younger folks and those new to the city.

Speaker 1:

So it's kind of like a more grown-up, sophisticated version of dorm life, with your own private space but shared common areas. I can see the appeal, especially for those who crave a built-in social network, but wouldn't sharing a kitchen and living space lead to well conflicts?

Speaker 2:

There are definitely challenges to navigate. Co-living spaces require clear communication, established ground rules and a willingness to compromise, but proponents argue that the sense of community and shared resources outweigh those challenges, especially in a city as expensive and isolating as New York.

Speaker 1:

It's definitely a different way of thinking about urban living. What about those ADUs? I haven't heard much about those.

Speaker 2:

ADUs or accessory dwelling units are essentially self-contained living spaces located on the same property as a single-family home. Think basement apartments, converted garages or even backyard cottages.

Speaker 1:

So they're like mini-apartments tucked away within existing residential areas. How do they fit into the city's grand?

Speaker 2:

plan allows homeowners to create additional housing options on their properties, increasing density without necessarily requiring the construction of massive new buildings. This can help to add affordable housing units to the market while preserving the existing character of neighborhoods.

Speaker 1:

It sounds like a win-win, providing more housing options while empowering homeowners to generate additional income, but I imagine there are also concerns about potential downsides, right?

Speaker 2:

There are Some people worry about the impact on parking availability, the strain on existing infrastructure and the potential for disputes between homeowners and tenants. Balancing the benefits of ADUs with these concerns is a key challenge for the city.

Speaker 1:

It sounds like this initiative is full of innovative ideas but also potential pitfalls. But also potential pitfalls. We've covered a lot of ground so far, from the grand vision of creating 80,000 new homes to the nitty-gritty details of how to make those homes affordable and integrate them into existing neighborhoods. But no major change comes without its share of controversy. In the next part we'll explore the pushback this initiative has faced and grapple with the difficult questions it raises about the future of housing in New York City. Welcome back to our deep dive into New York City's City of yes for Housing Opportunity initiative. We've kind of dissected the plan's ambitious goals and the innovative solutions it proposes, and even the financial mechanics behind it all. But you know, every revolution faces resistance, right? So what kind of pushback has this plan encountered?

Speaker 2:

It hasn't been all smooth sailing, that's for sure. Remember, over a third of the city council voted against this proposal. Some of the loudest opposition comes from residents who fear the impact of increased density on their neighborhoods. That makes sense.

Speaker 1:

Change can be unsettling, especially when it comes to something as fundamental as the character of one's neighborhood. What are some of their specific concerns?

Speaker 2:

While many worry that taller buildings will cast shadows and block views and lead to a sense of overcrowding, there are also concerns about the strain on existing infrastructure like schools, transportation, sanitation things that are already stretched thin in some areas.

Speaker 1:

So it's not just about NMB-ism Not in my backyard there are legitimate concerns about the potential downsides of rapid development. How is the city responding to this pushback?

Speaker 2:

It's a tightrope walk. The city is trying to balance the urgent need for more housing with the need to address residents' concerns and ensure that development happens in a thoughtful and sustainable way.

Speaker 1:

Is there anything built into the plan to mitigate these potential negative impacts?

Speaker 2:

There are a few key elements. First, the plan emphasizes community engagement. They're holding public meetings, soliciting feedback and trying to involve residents in the planning process. Second, a significant portion of the funding is dedicated to infrastructure improvements, as we discussed earlier. The idea is to make sure that new development doesn't overwhelm existing systems.

Speaker 1:

So it's about building not just housing, but also the infrastructure and community support needed to make those new developments successful and sustainable. But let's shift gears for a moment and look beyond the immediate challenges. What are the long-term ripples we might see from this initiative?

Speaker 2:

Well, the potential impact is huge. If successful, this plan could fundamentally reshape New York City. We're talking about potentially changing the city's skyline, demographics and even its cultural fabric.

Speaker 1:

That's a pretty profound thought that a housing plan could have such far reaching consequences. What are some specific examples of how this might play out?

Speaker 2:

Well for one. A significant increase in housing supply could, in theory, lead to more affordable rents that could attract a more diverse range of residents, making the city more economically and socially inclusive.

Speaker 1:

So it's not just about creating more housing units. It's about potentially creating a more equitable and dynamic city. What about the architectural landscape? Could this plan influence the way buildings are designed and built in New York?

Speaker 2:

Absolutely. The embrace of unconventional housing types like co-living and ADUs could lead to more creative and flexible living spaces. We might see a rise in micro-units, shared living spaces and innovative building designs that maximize space and efficiency.

Speaker 1:

It sounds like this initiative could be a catalyst for a wave of architectural innovation, pushing the boundaries of what urban living looks like. But let's be realistic. No plan is perfect. What are some potential pitfalls or unintended consequences that this city needs?

Speaker 2:

to be mindful of. One of the biggest challenges will be ensuring that the benefits of this plan are shared equitably. There's a risk that some neighborhoods might see a disproportionate amount of development, leading to displacement or gentrification.

Speaker 1:

So how can the city prevent this initiative from inadvertently exacerbating existing inequalities?

Speaker 2:

It comes down to careful planning and proactive measures. The city needs to prioritize affordable housing in all neighborhoods, invest in infrastructure in underserved areas and implement policies that protect tenants from displacement.

Speaker 1:

It sounds like this initiative is as much about social equity as it is about bricks and mortar, but New York City isn't operating in a vacuum. What kind of broader impact might this have on other cities around the world?

Speaker 2:

Well, new York is often seen as a global leader, a trendsetter. If this plan succeeds in creating a more affordable, equitable and sustainable housing model, it could inspire other cities to follow suit.

Speaker 1:

So New York City is like a giant urban laboratory, experimenting with solutions that could have global implications. It's pretty amazing to think about. As we wrap up this deep dive, what are some key takeaways for our listeners? What should they be pondering as they think about the future of housing in their own communities?

Speaker 2:

I think one crucial takeaway is that there's no silver bullet solution to the housing crisis. It's a complex issue with no easy answers, but what we see in New York is a willingness to experiment, to think outside the box and to prioritize bold action.

Speaker 1:

So it's not about finding the perfect plan, but about embracing innovation, community engagement and and a long-term vision. What's a final thought-provoking question our listeners can chew on?

Speaker 2:

Here's one. If your city were to embark on a similar housing revolution, what elements would you prioritize? What would your ideal vision for the future of housing look like?

Speaker 1:

That's a great question to leave our listeners with. It's a conversation that needs to happen in every community as we grapple with the challenges of creating livable, affordable and sustainable cities for the future. Thanks for joining us on this deep dive into New York City's bold experiment in housing. We'll continue to follow this story closely Until next time. Keep exploring, keep learning and keep asking those tough questions.

People on this episode

Head Shot

David (Viacheslav) Davidenko

Host