Welcome to David Invest, your AI-inspired real estate investing podcast. We explore a range of real estate investments, from multifamily assets to mixed-use properties.
David Davidenko, Co-Founder and Managing Partner of Sunrise Capital Group's portfolio boasts over 7,000 units and a staggering value of $600MM. At David Invest AI, you'll unlock the secrets behind these successful strategies and observe how AI transforms our interaction with real estate content.
We're not just another finance podcast. We're an innovative platform that combines technology and investment, breaking away from the conventional to create an intriguing learning journey.
🔗 Check out our website for more information and valuable resources: https://linkin.bio/davidinvest
📸 Follow us on Instagram for updates and behind-the-scenes content: https://www.instagram.com/davidinvestai/
📘 Connect with us on Facebook for community discussions and tips: https://www.facebook.com/Davidinvestai
🔗 Network with me on LinkedIn for professional connections and advice: https://www.linkedin.com/in/vdavidenko/
📧 Subscribe to our newsletter for exclusive investment tips and insights: https://sunrisecapitalgroup.com/subscribe/
📚 Check out my course on Udemy - https://www.udemy.com/course/passive-real-estate-investing/
Don't forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more real estate content!
Disclaimer: The content provided on this channel is intended for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or tax advice. We strongly recommend that you consult with qualified professionals before making any financial decisions. Past performance of investments is not indicative of future results. The information presented here is not a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or investments. Our firm may have conflicts of interest, and we do not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of the content provided. Investing involves risks, and you should carefully consider your financial situation and consult with a financial advisor.
Inside Trump's Childhood Home: A $1.3 Million Fall
•David (Viacheslav) Davidenko
Audio Player
00:00
00:00 | 10:34
Donald Trump's boyhood home in Queens recently sold for $835,000—a dramatic $1.3 million loss from its 2017 selling price of $2.14 million. This case study reveals fundamental real estate principles that affect all property owners, regardless of historical connections.
• Years of neglect led to severe deterioration with burst pipes, mold, and even stray cats taking over the property • Neighbors were forced to mow the overgrown lawn while the house sat abandoned • A failed attempt to capitalize on presidential fame through Airbnb rentals at $815/night proved unsustainable • The Chinese investor who paid $2.14 million later tried to crowdfund $3 million to gift the house to Trump • New owners secured fix-and-flip loans exceeding the purchase price, signaling plans for rapid renovation and resale • Historical significance alone cannot maintain property value without consistent maintenance • Speculative purchases based solely on novelty or trends carry significant investment risk • Sound fundamentals—location, condition, and market appeal—ultimately determine long-term property value
Beyond the obvious factors like location and size, what less tangible elements truly contribute to a property's enduring value and legacy? What makes a place truly last?
Disclaimer: The content provided on this channel is intended for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or tax advice. We strongly recommend that you consult with qualified professionals before making any financial decisions. Past performance of investments is not indicative of future results. The information presented here is not a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or investments. Our firm may have conflicts of interest, and we do not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of the content provided. Investing involves risks, and you should carefully consid...
You know it makes you wonder how does a house with a connection to a former president of the United States end up selling for over a million dollars less than it did just a few years prior? We're diving into this story of Donald Trump's boyhood home in Queens, which recently sold for $835,000, a far cry from the $2.14 million it fetched back in 2017.
Speaker 2:
a far cry from the $2.14 million it fetched back in 2017. Yeah, it's a really compelling case study and it shines a light on some fundamental principles of real estate that are well relevant to everyone. Really, today, on the Deep Dive, we're going to unpack exactly what led to this dramatic drop in value. We've got some fascinating excerpts compiled into what we're calling pasted text that give us a close look at the situation. Okay, our goal is to understand how a property with such a unique backstory could depreciate so significantly and what valuable lessons you can take away, whether you're a homeowner, maybe a potential investor or just, you know, curious about the market.
Speaker 1:
Absolutely, and this isn't just about rubbernecking at a news story. It's about understanding the underlying dynamics at play here. So picture this an unassuming Tudor-style home at 8515 Wareham Place in Queens. Built in 1940 by Fred C Trump, it was in many ways a classic symbol of striving for the American dream.
Speaker 2:
And that's an important point to keep in mind. This wasn't some palatial estate or an architectural marvel.
Speaker 1:
No, not at all.
Speaker 2:
Its claim to fame obviously came much later, but, as our source material reveals, by 2024, this once symbolic house had become something of a cautionary story.
Speaker 1:
Which brings us right back to that central puzzle how did this presidential link, which you might expect to boost a property's value, seemingly do the opposite? Ok, let's start to unpack this. The first thing that really stands out is the rather blunt reality of neglected maintenance.
Speaker 2:
Yeah, that's a big one. What's striking here is the picture painted by the neighbors, words like abandoned, neglected, and even the detail about it being infested with stray cats. That really tells a story of significant deterioration.
Speaker 1:
Stray cats Wow.
Speaker 2:
Yeah, we're talking about years of vacancy leading to no one addressing issues like a burst pipe in the basement that caused mold, and can you imagine the neighbors having to step in to mow the overgrown lawn?
Speaker 1:
Ugh no, it's almost unbelievable, isn't it? You'd think a house with this kind of history would be treated with a certain level of care, almost as a point of interest.
Speaker 2:
You really would.
Speaker 1:
Yet the source material mentions vacate and water shut off notices not exactly signs of pride and ownership. And the fact that the interior was reportedly stripped down to the bare studs suggests a level of disrepair far beyond just, you know, cosmetic issues.
Speaker 2:
Oh, way beyond. It really drives home a fundamental principle in real estate the physical condition of a property is paramount. Our source even offers a compelling contrast with Barack Obama's childhood home in Honolulu, which has been preserved and cherished.
Speaker 1:
Interesting comparison.
Speaker 2:
Yeah, and that comparison underscores that historical significance alone isn't enough to maintain value. It requires active and consistent upkeep. So for you, the clear takeaway is that even the most unique associations can't protect a property from the financial consequences of neglect. We're talking about potentially deterring buyers, incurring significant repair costs and, ultimately, a much lower sale price.
Speaker 1:
And on the topic of unique situations, let's delve into what our source describes as a literal takeover by stray cats. I mean, it's a vivid image this house with a presidential connection becoming a haven for a feline colony.
Speaker 2:
It's certainly an unusual element of this story, yeah, but as the source highlights, it really became a tangible symbol of the property's abandonment. While the volunteers feeding them may have had good intentions, it inadvertently reinforced the idea that no one was truly in control or caring for the house itself.
Speaker 1:
Right, it went beyond just being vacant.
Speaker 2:
Exactly, it was actively being inhabited by animals.
Speaker 1:
It really makes you stop and consider, doesn't it? What's the trajectory for these older properties, these little pieces of history, when they're simply left unattended? The stray cat situation, while quirky, is a stark illustration of decay in action.
Speaker 2:
Absolutely. And that leads us to another key factor in this price drop the rather ambitious Airbnb experiment.
Speaker 1:
Yes, the Airbnb angle.
Speaker 2:
In 2017, coinciding with Donald Trump's inauguration, a Chinese investor operating under the name Trump Birth House LLC purchased the property for over $2 million. The strategy was to capitalize on its novelty by turning it into a presidential-themed short-term rental.
Speaker 1:
And they did list it for a while at a pretty significant $815 a night.
Speaker 2:
Steep price.
Speaker 1:
The source mentions marketing it as a presidential experience and even the installation of somewhat suggestive plaques. You can almost picture the sales pitch Come sleep for a president, you know start out, yeah, and what's particularly interesting here is the initial wave of attention.
Speaker 2:
The article notes worldwide interest, especially from Chinese tourists, who were intrigued by Trump's business background and his path to the presidency. There was definitely a novelty factor at play a desire to experience something tangibly linked to a well-known figure.
Speaker 1:
But as the eventual sale price clearly shows that initial buzz didn't translate into lasting value, did it?
Speaker 2:
Not at all.
Speaker 1:
By 2021,. The owner was attempting to crowdfund a massive $3 million to gift the house to Trump.
Speaker 2:
Yeah, that's telling.
Speaker 1:
That, to me, suggested it become more of a burden than a viable investment, a unique item they couldn't effectively leverage. Why try to give it away unless it's costing you money and not generating enough income?
Speaker 2:
Exactly, and this provides a crucial insight for investors and even homeowners. Considering the short-term rental market, relying solely on novelty or current trends, is a precarious foundation for long-term asset value. The initial excitement can quickly fade, leaving you with a property that may not appeal to a broad range of renters or buyers. The market often values more fundamental aspects like location, condition and broader appeal.
Speaker 1:
Right Fundamentals always matter. So fast forward to 2024 and a new entity enters the picture, a Brooklyn-based LLC called 1388 Group, which acquired the property for a much lower $835,000. Yep, and this is where another layer of the story unfolds. They immediately secure two loans totaling over $930,000 from Ackland, a lender specializing in what are known as fix-and-flip loans.
Speaker 2:
And the involvement of a lender that focuses on fix-and-flip financing is a strong indicator of the new owner's intentions. These types of loans are typically short-term, often with higher interest rates, and are designed to fund a quick renovation followed by a resale for profit. It suggests the new owners aren't necessarily focused on preserving the historical aspects of the property.
Speaker 1:
no, and the observations from the neighbors seem to corroborate this. Our source quotes a neighbor saying the new owner specializes in flipping houses, not keeping them intact. The current activity construction workers gutting the interior, dumpsters overflowing with debris and covered in tagging certainly points to a rapid transformation rather than careful restoration.
Speaker 2:
Yeah, that paints a pretty clear picture. This situation really brings the practical realities of real estate into sharp focus. While the house has a unique history, the new owners are clearly prioritizing its potential for generating profit in the current market.
Speaker 1:
Which leads us to the fundamental real estate lessons we can draw from this whole saga. As we've seen, even a house with a connection to a former president isn't immune to the harsh realities of the market if it's neglected and if attempts to capitalize on its fame don't pan out.
Speaker 2:
Exactly.
Speaker 1:
The historical association alone wasn't enough to maintain or increase its value.
Speaker 2:
So for you listening, what are the clear takeaways? Whether you own a home or are thinking about investing, first and foremost, neglecting the upkeep of any property, regardless of its history or perceived prestige, will inevitably lead to a decline in its value. Deferred maintenance adds up, it deters buyers and it can lead to significant financial losses. Simple as that.
Speaker 1:
Yeah, basic maintenance is key. Secondly, be wary of speculative purchases based solely on trends or novelty. While there can be opportunities in unique properties relying on short-lived buzz like a presidential connection, for long-term investment success is a significant risk.
Speaker 2:
Definitely risky.
Speaker 1:
The Airbnb experiment highlights how quickly that kind of appeal can just fizzle out.
Speaker 2:
It really does. And finally, remember that novelty has a limited lifespan. That unique selling point, whether it's a celebrity connection or a quirky architectural feature, can attract initial interest, sure, but it can't be the sole driver of a property's value. Buyers ultimately consider factors like condition, location and overall market appeal the basics.
Speaker 1:
Right Back to the fundamentals again. So to bring it all together, the dramatic story of Donald Trump's boyhood home isn't really about politics, is it?
Speaker 2:
No, not fundamentally.
Speaker 1:
It's a fascinating case study in real estate fundamentals. The significant drop in value was a result of a combination of factors Years of neglect leading to physical deterioration, a failed attempt to leverage its novelty in the short-term rental market and the inherent risks associated with speculative real estate ventures.
Speaker 2:
And the core message really boils down to this. While a property's history can be interesting and even add some value, it's the consistent care, responsible ownership and a realistic understanding of market dynamics that truly determine its long-term worth. History alone isn't enough.
Speaker 1:
This whole situation, as unusual as it is, serves as a powerful reminder for you that real estate is about so much more than just the physical building. It's about the ongoing responsibility of stewardship, both of the physical asset and, in some cases, the stories it holds.
Speaker 2:
Well said. So, as you reflect on this deep dive, consider this Beyond the obvious factors like location and size, what are the less tangible elements that truly contribute to a property's enduring value and legacy? What makes a place truly last?
.jpg)
